Liquidity, momentum and price bubbles : evidence from the UK
Abstract
The asset pricing anomalies have existed in the UK stock market for a long time.
This thesis aims to study different liquidity measures, liquidity commonality, systematic
liquidity risk, different momentum trading strategies, asset pricing risks
with momentum, investor behaviours with momentum and the causal link between
financial crisis and asset pricing anomalies using various methods and tests.
The first empirical chapter examines the performance of the standard Sharpe-
Lintner CAPM, the Fama-French three factor model, and the four factor model of
Carhart (1997) both with, and without, the first component of multiple illiquidity
measures. The results show that no individual illiquidity proxy outperforms the
others, and further that the illiquidity proxies have a systematic common illiquidity
component. The results also reveal that the inclusion of the illiquidity factor
in the capital asset pricing model plays a significant role in explaining the crosssectional
variation in stock returns. The second empirical chapter analyses the
relationship between momentum profits and stock market illiquidity. This study
finds negative and significant relationship between aggregate market illiquidity
and momentum profits. The model applied in this chapter captures significant
bounce in varying beta coe cients changing over time. The analysis also indicates
that the stocks associated with high liquidity performs better relative to
illiquid stocks under systemic shocks. The final empirical chapter investigated
momentum anomaly and the hypothesis that individual investors trade differently
from institutional investors and significantly overreact to economic shocks,
creating destabilising effect in the stock market. The results reveal that stock market ineffi ciency is driven and dominated by individual investors' anchoring
and adjustment biases as well as institutional investors' cognitive biases.
There are several implications for this work. The findings may be useful for both
individual and institutional investors and regulators in similar markets beyond the
UK, for example, the other European markets. In this study, we show that abnormal
stock performance during liquidity crisis is, in part, predictable, and investors
can construct portfolios of stocks that better withstand liquidity shocks. For individual
investors, they can maximise their profits by holding momentum portfolios
at a short horizon. For institutional investors, they might take advantage of professional
expertise in making abnormal profits. Policy makers are expected to
pay special attention to the differences in trading by financial institutions and
individual investors.